Media Resources For Readers For Journalists For Journalism Students Media Statistics Statistics Legal
Development Reporting Media Activism Media and Disability Media and Gender Media Diversity Privacy
Another defamation notice
Posted/Updated Wednesday, May 16 12:13:23, 2012
Rs 100 crore defamation notices are now par for the course. After Justice Sawant's suit against Arnab Goswami, and Times Now's legal notice for the same damages to The Hoot, we now have Shekhar Gupta and other authors of the Indian Express page one story on April 4 asking Vinod Mehta and Open magazine for  Rs  100 crore in damages for defaming them. In an interview to Open magazine Mehta had described the Express story as "a mistake of Himalayan proportions" and asserted repeatedly that it was a planted story.

Defence lawyers in the hit-and-run trial against actor Salman Khan have issued a statement to media houses citing a July 24, 2013, interim court order asking for a restriction on the reportage of the case. On March 27, 2015, another application was filed by Salman Khan's lawyers restraining the media from taking photographs, video and audio recordings of the proceedings in the court.  The lawyers also asked the court to direct the media to desist from bringing in experts/lawyers on TV channels to discuss this case and evidence  till the conclusion of the trial. 
On March 29 Al Jazeera had a ten-minute coverage on The Indian media's rural blind spot: it contained figures from small surveys, such as the monthly coverage of rural India on the first page of Hindi and English papers (1.4 % for Hindu in Dec. 2014; zero for rest) and channels (6.6% for Aaj Tak in Dec. 2014; almost zero for most English channels). The report had usual suspects—P. Sainath; Gaon Connection; Khabar Lahariya; except for Rajdeep Sardesai, who conceded, “Let me be honest: the business model of Television today is struggling to try and plough back investment in business…”
Today was India Today’s turn to get castigated on social media (#ShameOnIndiaToday) – and deservedly so: this was after the magazine’s website posted a video with caption “Deepika or Kim Kardashian who’s your choice for a one night stand”. India Today took down the article and offered an apology, “Dear readers, we made a mistake. We are sorry,” though the URL still contains the same caption. 
Soon after India lost to Australia in the World Cup today, Headlines Today showed images of people lined up somewhere in India with one among them throwing down a television set in presumed disgust. Rajdeep Sardesai even wondered "if they were second-hand" because the cameras were around. A similar thing had happened in Pakistan when that country had lost. If this is done for the cameras who initiates it?  The 'angry' who want their moment of fame on TV or the TV crews looking for action?
1) Copy Editors (News): Language obsessives who want to be custodians of its angular content style and pitching; this is an opportunity for sharp copy editors t
The Press Trust of India Ltd (PTI) is looking for experienced journalists for editorial positions at its Business Desk in New Delhi. Required Experience: 4-8 ye
Does India need an independent and autonomous public broadcaster?
Cannot say
Copyright2011. THE HOOT. All Rights Reserved.