Her journalism was activism

BY BP SANJAY| IN Opinion | 06/09/2017
Gauri Lankesh will be remembered as an intellectual who like her father integrated journalism as a practice to uphold basic values.
BP SANJAY describes her moorings
Gauri Lankesh


The last edition of the Gauri  Lankesh Patrike is available on the web site as news of her murder last night is being reported and discussed in the media. Described as yet another killing of  an intellectual after M.M. Kalburgi’s assassination on August 30, 2015, her murder is seen within the framework of her work as a journalist and also editor of the journal  she had inherited from her  father (although she had to recast it with her name prefixing the periodical owing to differences within the family). It may not be appropriate now to contextualize the reasons for the launch and subsequent success of the Lankesh Patrike that her father, a professor of English had started in July 1980. A paradigm shift owing to  critical tensions within Kannada literary history had created a new brand of writers believing in “Bandaya” (revolt/resistance/protest) literature. Terms such as insurgent journalism and counter hegemonic journalism have been used to describe the journal and its practices.  A full length feature film, Lankesh Patrike has been produced and directed by Indrajit, Gauri’s brother.

Gauri was in the forefront of taking up the cause of rehabilitation of the naxalites in some parts of Karnataka. She was a member of the State level committee (communal harmony forum) to negotiate and mainstream them. According to KL Ashok another member of the committee, Gauri’s death is not of a journalist, but the death of democracy and constitutional values. “She had raised her voice against communal violence with us and we know that all our lives are in danger. But we did not expect this.”


The latest issue of the Gauri Lankesh Patrike


The home minister of Karnataka, after visiting the government hospital where the body was taken for post mortem has mentioned that there may be clues or some footage in the two CCTVs in the vicinity that the police are examining.  Tributes through audio and video bytes were part of the media coverage including an interview with her colleague who said that she had signed off and asked him to leave for the day around 7 pm.

It was breaking news across channels. India Today’s Rajdeep Sardesai sought to play down attribution of specific motives by the persons and organizations she critiqued. Congress spokesperson was queried on the associated violence that was occurring in the state ruled by congress.  The fact that the assassins in other cases were still free was also flagged. BJP spokesperson critiqued the jumping to conclusions by the Congress and blamed it on the poor law and order management in the State. The former police chief of the Western range in the State appreciated her liberal and understanding approach in dealing with extremism.

Gauri Lankesh’s murder will justifiably occupy centre stage in public and media discourse. She will be remembered as an intellectual who like her father integrated journalism as a practice to uphold basic values.


B P Sanjay is at the University of Hyderabad 



The Hoot is the only not-for-profit initiative in India which does independent media monitoring. Your support is vital for this website. Click here to make a contribution.
Subscribe To The Newsletter
The back story of the huge apology notice published by the Hindustan Times on September 18 (see this Hoot brief) is to be found in the record of sittings of the Privileges Committee of the Lok Sabha. The apology was published three days after the last sitting to which the editor of HT was summoned. The notice given by  Andhra Pradesh MP Jithender Reddy was taken up five times by the Committee  between July end and September 15. This too has fed into the wide ranging speculation over the reason for the resignation of the current editor of the paper, Aparisim Ghosh.                       

Did it really take the Hindustan Times almost six months to figure out that it had got the figures on the attendance  in Parliament of certain MPs, wrong? Or is there more to why it carried a front page apology covering half the page on September 18? It said, "In the edition of March 24, 2017, we had, because of a technical glitch, erroneously reported the attendance in Parliament of certain MPs. Below are the accurate figures. Hindustan Times offers an unconditional apology, and deeply regrets any offence or inconvenience caused." Of the seven MPs whom it said had 100 per cent attendance  not one had it, the paper listed six other names for this statistic. And the list of those whom it said had the worst attendance in Parliament is headed by Abhijeet Mukherjee, the former President's son, who in fact has a figure of 97 per cent attendance.                                    

View More

The Washington Post  is rolling out Talk  a new commenting system that will allow the paper to better engage with readers who comment on its stories and help promote civil conversations. The software was developed by the Coral Project, a collaboration between The Post, the NYT and Mozilla, funded by a grant from the  Knight Foundation. The Post will integrate Talk with ModBot, its AI-powered comment moderation technology.                                                                         

Propublica has built a  Facebook bot which is a tiny computer program that automatically converses with you over Facebook Messenger to determine you experiences with reporting hate speech on Facebook. Its says its objective is to learn more about Facebook’s secret censorship rules and what the social media determines is hate speech. (Nieman Lab)                                       
View More